kain_kusanagi said:
The prosecution uses motive to define the culpability of the defendant. The motive is a kind of evidence in convicting the defendant. Once you have a conviction the motive is irrelevant. Some crimes have minimum sentences. Take Murder 1 for example. The motive was used to convict, but the sentence is determined by the crime. As for the reasons for violent crimes. I am very much aware there are many motives for committing violence. I was obviously talking about bullies not robbers. My point was always that hate for a nerd or a gay or a minority are equal. Hate for someone who bumped your shoulder is just as irrational as gay bashing. I don't like the term "hate crime" becuase is segregates and we need less segregation and more equality in this world. |
Nope, it's not. The motive is used to decide what charges you're bringing against someone. And whether a crime is murder 1, or murder 2 or something else is determined by the motive.
And no, hate for someone who bumped your shoulder isn't the same as hating a minority. It's actually more rational than hating a minority (mainly because you're hating a single individual who actualy did something to you - albeit by accident - as opposed to an entire group of people, where you don't know any of the individuals, and simply hate them due to a trait they share that is neutral and not harmful).
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)







