Awesome Diablo III Cinematic Trailer

[lestatdark]

padib said:

lestatdark said:

padib said:

lestatdark said:

padib said:

Ever tried Starcarft 64? :S

I did...it's on the same level of suckyness, without the need of buying a memory card solely for that game XD XD XD.

@TruckOSaurus - I can't fanthom that either, but it seems there has been a demand for a console version, even here on VGC by some members (i.e - those that don't know that PC gaming exists or think that you need to spend a bajillion dollars on one). 

That's a retarded POV because Blizzard is known to make games that don't require too much from your computer. haha Some ppl!

Well, that's more of a general approach to PC gaming as a whole rather than Blizzard games. Heck, I bet the minimum requirements for DIII will be met by PCs at least 7 years old.

I remember being able to play starcraft on like a Pentium II. They just always made their games playable on the weakest architectures. Yeah, it's a little different now with all the effects and different settings you can adjust so nowadays I guess most PC games now can be customized to a certain extent to fit the weaker architectures. But I haven't been as involved in the PC world when that started to happen (mostly 3D gaming). One game I had a hard time getting to work on my PC was Final Fantasy VIII, but for games like starcraft, Diablo or Warcraft I rarely ever had any problems.

FFVIII was a bitch to set up because it was a very, very shoddy optimization work. FFVII was better in that aspect. No one tops Blizzard when it comes to PC optimization, heck I can play WCI and Starcraft without having to resort to DOSBOX to play them, which is becoming increasingly rare these days for old school PC games.