Andrespetmonkey on 27 October 2011
| Mr Khan said: Agnostic is the properly rational route. Given the compelling teleological arguments made by theists of all faiths, deists, and philosophers, one can understand the vast subtleties that could entail an unobservable, spiritual world, but at the same time it is indisputable that these intangible concepts are empirically unverifiable. At the end of the day, it's a catch between the fact that any god, gods, or some other divine pantheon are neither empirically verifiable nor empirically unverifiable |
I think atheism is just as rational. My reasons being:
- The idea of a god is man-made
- No reason to believe, default position is disbelief until given reason.
I understand the points most agnostics will make but I'm confident that my atheism came from rational reasons.
