theRepublic said:
I think you missed his point. What Rol is saying, is that back in the old days there was no guarantee that you were going to be good enough to get to the end of the game. Or even good enough to see most of the game. With the current generation, most games are easy enough that just about anyone can finish them. |
I understood that, but my comment was also in line with the rest of his comment. Back in those days, finishing a game such as Ninja Gaiden, Crystalis, the original Zelda, Ghouls and Goblins, Contra, Battletoads, etc, was itself an achievement, even if it was only for personal gratification. Of course, not a lot of people can say that they finished X, Y or Z game from that era, but those that do felt a sense of achievement higher than anything this past gens have ever given.
Probably the sense of entitlement to finish a game wasn't present on most gamers before, but to some, finishing a game was all that mattered, no matter the difficulty, no matter how long it would take. At least that was true for me and still is nowadays, no matter how easy and dumb-proof the majority of gaming has become.
Current PC Build
CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"