Michael-5 said:
Well I assume the campaign is perfect, but I don't feel a game like UC3 deserves a 10/10. GTAIV was a sandbox game. It's a game you can play for hours and hours and hours doing anything you want, and with all the experience on the PS2, they really perfected this game. However I would still say it deserves a 9.9/10 because there is no tank. As for MGS4, I really just don't see how everyone could love the game. To some it's a 10/10, but you can't review the game for the fans, otherwise every game would get 10/10. It has flaws, it's short, load times between acts are insane, and I find the whole experience too over the top (situations are just silly at times). Ocarina of Time deserves 10/10. It's the one game I completed to 100% as a kid, before achievements and trophies. The gameplay at the time was a decade ahead of it's time. We still see games strugling to play as smoothly and as well as Ocarina of time, and most platformers copy Zelda (and Super Mario 64 for the matter) in one way or another. Back to UC3, playing the beta, I full out did not agree with the reviewer. He himself said it's difficult to aim at people, rewards you for too many things, and well has flaws, but it a massive improvement over UC2. Being better does not mean your perfect. If the game is perfect, Multiplayer should have brought down the score to something between 9.5-9.8/10. Games today get way too inflated scores. How many movies on IMDB score above 9/10? There are more great games now days then great movies, but 10/10 means the game is the best of the gen, it's a game everyone who like the genre can enjoy, and a game which introduces new elements to gaming which are just shocking. UC3 does deliver a movie like experience (I assume much better then UC2), and it may be best of the gen, especially for single player. However the replay value isn't as good as compeditors. |
Dont let the Foxhound avatar fool you, i dont think MGS4 is 10 either, dont care for the online, its a bitch to set up and it is just ho-hum to play and I hated the European section. 9.5 for me.
OOT is a ten because you completed to 100% so did most of us. I would argue it was a ten at THAT time. But now?? By your own criteria it does not have replay value, so would you give it a ten today???
U3, did they change the aiming, I never had a problem. They reward for too many things?? I think thats a good thing. I dont know how much time you put into U2 multi but when you start to get to the level 40s its a bitch a level up. And that game had a cap of 70. I think they are trying to make the game more accesible, nothing wrong with that, thats the reason COD is where it is at today.
I agree with you on inflated scores, but what game in Uncharted genre does it better than Uncharted??? Which of these games have better replay value?? Im asking cause i dont know, not to bust balls, I dont think it should get a ten either. But i havent played it.