Don´t worry guys, you can´t control reviews. After releasing U2, you just knew that reviewers would be looking for flaws, and things to criticise.
The review that says more about this game is the Gametrailers one, and that review tells me that U3 is a better game then U2 and it actually shows in the score.
I will never understand how can, the same reviewer, say that Gears 3 or U3 (any game), is better then their predecessors, in every single way, wich made the experience more fun and durable, and have a lower score. That for me only means that U2 and Gears 2 were over rated by those reviewers.
If a game is tecnically superior, more diverse, more spetacular, etc, etc, which ends in a more enjoyable experience, this game should be rated higher, regardless of the year and how gaming standards have changed.
That is why I totally disagree with how easy it is to get perfect scores in todays industry. U2 is IMO the best game this gen, and even on that game, the amount of perfect scores is ridiculous.
You see the amount of 10s Batman is getting, tell me, how is it possible for the next game to be reviewed correctly??? Arkham City is not a 10 (IMO), I am sorry, it is a great game, it is fun, but it is not a perfect 10. Next game, will be tecnically better, even more diverse, with a ritcher world, more fun, and........ it will get worst scores. It makes no sense.
And if you ask ND or Sony, they want sales this time around, they had the critical aclaim with U2, now it is important for them to go in mega-franchise territory when it come to sales (of course great reviews help but it is not like this game is averaging 8s)







