yeah i dont get why people are making a big deal about this? From the reviews ive heard so far id say they are justified (most of them). I mean complaining about a 93 meta ? Seriously? Doesnt make sense in any way.
Most people here are saying that Uncharted 3 is a better game than 2. First of all most of you guys havnt even played the game! And secondly, if a game isnt a massive improvement over the previous one, then its justified to get less or the same based on the review criteria. Some gaming sites clearly explain this in the criteria.
Reading the eurogamer review i felt it should have atleast get a 9 though, they focused on complaints that they didnt focus on with U2 (which is silly cos they have the same "flaws"). I guess they were expecting a major change in the game structure...which was never gonna happen. Other than that i thought it was a good descriptive review.
What i dont understand is how some gaming review sites give a franchise like call of duty, constantly high scores. But then again it seems to be harder to get a high score in a single player driven game.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
