ctalkeb said:
"You're definition." Are we supposed to take you seriously? Even if we ignore that OPs list of games include several with multiplayer aspects, including some whose popularity arise from their multiplayer modes, we also have to excuse other fallacies. Firstly a tradition of several thousand years in designing single player games and secondly that single player games involve playing against a set of rules, while toys doesn't involve any ruleset at all. I'm sure he's spouted more silliness than that, but it's one in the morning and I can't be bothered looking for more. |
LOL at the bolded part. Wouldnt casuals still need the damn hardware to access the game?? Unless you can play these "casual" games without the hardware to run it, PC or otherwise. This thread is one of the most silliest, ignorant things ive read in a while, but damned if it aint entertaining
