S.T.A.G.E. said:
The reason for why videogames were considered toys from the 80's to 90's was because of Nintendo. They never outgrew the images they created 25+ years ago. This was the era when videogames were considered toys. The perception has changed ever since Sony entered the gaming realm. They turned the videogame console into a viable gaming machine that could be enjoyed by adults as well and give more mature visuals much like what is seen on PC games. Arcades were respected in those days because they had the graphics and once Sony came into the console market it slowly ate away at the arcades because they created graphical powerhouses that could be played at home. Sony is responsible for turning the gaming the videogame console into the home center. This is what prompted Microsoft to join. Microsoft saw that Sony was turning the videogame system into a console that becomes the living room center. It is made for games, but because of the format it uses can also play DVD's, music and store other files secondary to its main purpose. It split gamers in half as to what was kiddy and what wasn't. Nintendo never grew up in that way, which is why it maintains that toy and novelty image though everyone still respects them for what they've contributed to the industry. That can never be taken away. Comparing videogames to toys today is like calling a DVD player or PC a toy, which is completely and utterly retarded. Videogame consoles are the center of the living room today, nothing more, nothing less. In the entertainment industry videogames could well be the replacement for movies, because videogames help you delve into complex worlds only seen in movies.
Secondly, your statement on the casuals makes absolutely no sense. Casuals do not like games more than the hardcore, which is why they are called casuals. You also bastardized the definitions I gave to you as to what casual means. Go and tell an actual game developer who plays through the teeth to go to expensive schools that he makes games for toys. He's not a toy maker. Seeing as how you skewed the definition of what a toy from the actual defition that I got from dictionary.com I would say you were a troll. This is my last post to you.
P.S.
I am studying illustration, storyboarding and concept art at a school where they make videogames. I think I know what is meant for children and adults and what is a toy and what isn't.
|
I only read the PS bit. Illustration, stories and concept art are only required for toys. Games don't have to have any of those, toys do. Excluding board games, games never needed any of those things until the digital age.
You should study game making instead of wasting your time learing how to paint pictures and making digital clay models.
