HappySqurriel said:
Its nice to know you'd rather argue with logical fallacies than addressing the substance of someone's argument ... |
I don't argue with logical fallacies. You can't argue with a logical falacy, because the falacy has a mind of its own. In regards to the points said above, what is seen is as follows:
* The 1 in 6 in poverty are in poverty because it is their own fault.
* Why should anyone bother to help these people, because it is their fault?
* These losers have answers, it is to go to a communist country, because communist are their own kin. This is a dream of theirs, that they will live until they, scum, die off.
* Doing this will prevent turning another place into a ghetto.
Exactly what "substance" am I supposed to discuss here? The video link I posted at least attempts to make a more coherant argument against equality, and argues, at least somewhat reasonably, why equality is a farce and people who are loser should be left to die and why. Did you ever bother to click on that video? If you did, you woult see it goes into a philosophical justification for sayingw hat is said.







