Final-Fan said:
theprof00 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
theprof00 said:
Yes, why do you think I was asking to be copped?
I also said "there's nothing in my pm rules that says I can't get someone to prove me wrong"
|
That's the point where your lies got the best of you. You had already stated that you were guilty upon investigation, you asking to be copped created a contradiction in your discourse which to me is a pretty good reason to vote for someone.
|
Sigh.
In a game where a restricted poster is forced to say something, then it is not a lie. I see your point Trucks, but in the game YOU were playing, there didn't exist the possibility of a restricted poster, despite your own outlandish role. It didn't matter how many times I said that my role was strange or that people aren't very familiar with roles, or that my role made me claim miller, the idea of the role never occurred to you.
One day, there will be a restricted poster (I promise not in my game, because it's too obvious now), or there will be a crazy cop, or there will be a godfather, and it won't occur to you that unknown roles in an unknown setup is not a good source of evidence.
|
Miller claim --> "Don't bother investigating me" --> "No wait, please investigate me" --> lynch this crazy person. If you'd left out the middle part, people might have fallen for your post-restriction gambit.
Also, your promise is just another lie to try to make it TOTALLY A SURPRISE when you do in fact put post restrictions in all the roles in your next game.
As for myself, I don't plan on ever putting "you must post false information" post restrictions in any roles I hand out, but you have given me an idea on something I WOULD do ...
Oh man I want to host a game now.
|
like... "a nightmare before christmass"?
