By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
superchunk said:
Seece said:
superchunk said:
lol ad is funny... like anyone plays any dancing game alone.

In a party atmosphere... wii dance games are just more fun. More players at a time, just as much movement, etc...

Even Just Dance on Kinect isn't as much fun as the Wii version.

Really superchunk, sometimes even you must sigh at your love for Nintendo.

Anyway, different strokes for different folks, if you can't see the appeal in Dance Central then .. well I'm not surprised. It has 2 player so that isn't 'alone' and judging by the last games sales, it seems 2+ million dance 'alone'

You don't need to use controllers and it's real dancing, vs Just Dance which isn't, the entire game is better quality and obviously mroe talent has had to go into DC than JD.

I can certainly see the appeal in Just Dance though, just like how the majority prefer Mcdonalds over a steakhouse

Only part I liked better about DC was the playback of your video. Otherwise JD is just more fun.

As for first DC being one player.. that doesn't mean people played by themselves. They played in turns (borrrring...) with many other people.

You're example is really bad as well.. a better example is between Mario Kart's fun arcade style to GT's push for simulation. MK, like JD, sells way more due to it being a simply funner game... and that's what games are for ... fun. Especially a dance game which is really a party game.

My example is fine, just because you don't think it's fun doesn't mean it isn't. You seem to think a game has to be cheap easy to be fun, somehow real dancing is boooring rofl.

What you really mean is, Just Dance is fun to the Wii crowd and DC isn't, I'd probably agree with that, they wouldn't appreciate it like the 360 crowd will do over Just Dance 3.