| zarx said: Are you seriusly going to debate the official concepts of Pantheism and the dictionary definition of religion now? thats what i was talking about the ignorance. people think religion doesn't have logic and its blind when infact they are really blind. yeah you can go to the dictionary and chck it out but will the dictionary give you what its philosophical meaning is and how its philosophy is related to the world?
So you are now saying that not being religious doesn't make you weak but you are just saying that you consider non religious people weak? no i am saying is that most people who call themselves athiest and still follow moral lives aren't really athiest as they are following the same ethics that are mentioned in the religions they think of religion the same way our ignorant society does Religion is not purely about theistic beliefs but Athiesm is about the lack of thiestic belifes right but atheism also philosophically is that there are no consequences and as the thread is clearly labled that is what I am talking about. And an athiest can belive in karma as long as he/she doesn't belive there is some consius diety or spirit controlling it. yes but thats what pantheism is about not atheism you are trying to give atheism a new meaning with the way you think of it when there is already a word 'pantheism' for what you mean I think you are confusing Athiests with anarchists or something... You don't even have to belong to a religion to belive in god let alone be an upstanding citizen... So yea you are just trolling right? You are really not that stupid right? thats being ignorant |







