By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
badgenome said:
richardhutnik said:

Economic systems, planned or not, have a way to get people to do things they don't want to do as a career.  In a totally free market driven system, a person may want to be an artist, but if the market doesn't care he is an artist (say you are in a world like Idiocracy had where the people watch buttocks on the screen for 2 hours), then the market will say, "You need to find something else to do".  The difference is that, in a planned economy there is a said "genius" at top that plans out everything.  In an unplanned economy, you run into hiring managers and computer systems that tell you whether or not you get hired and you have to guess what the market wants.

Like, golly gee, I would like to make a living creating boardgames.  Well, as it is now, you don't make a living creating board games, because the money is too low to do that.  To try to pitch the "freedom to choose" as some sort of thing anyone can do, which would fix every ill is to totally misrepresent how markets work.

Freedom to choose doesn't mean that you're entitled to succeed, naturally, since consumers are also free and will rebuff an artist whose work they dislike or can't relate to. But it does mean that you have the freedom to try your hand at whatever you want, whereas in a planned economy, you simply don't.

By the same token, supporting free markets doesn't necessitate seeing the free market as the cure for all ills. It only requires that a person come to the realization that centrally planned economies always fail spectacularly because it would take a God-like intelligence to manage such things, and of course, no such person exists or ever shall.

Additionally, create a good board game that works on a computer as an Iphone app or a Steam game and you totally can make a living off it.

See Greed Corp.  Which not only is a good example, is a hilarious name considering the thread.


It's essentially Probable happieness vs almost uniform but equal unhappiness.  Though in general that's basically the route of all Capitalism vs Commuism type things.

Outside a anarcho-capitalist system the more you tilt towards the Communist (or should i say socialist) side of the scale, the more you hurt future generations and the later life of current generations to improve the lot of people in the present.