Michael-5 said:
crissindahouse said:
Michael-5 said:
Anyone who said yes clearly is not human, and a wolf.
Humans can only see 26 or 29FPS (I forget).
What you do see in 30 FPS videos is a dip in FPS. If FPS dips, even slightly, a human can see it.
So if you are playing a game on PC, and your PC can handle the game at 30FPS smoothly, you don't need to upgrade the FPS for better visuals. If your playing console, you should play 60FPS because the FPS dip in both cases, but at 60FPS our eyes are more tolerable (we won't notice a drop to 45 FPS unless there is screen tearing). |
just like someone posted a link in this thread, this is wrong. if someone shows you 250 fps and only one of it has a picture you can say which it was. with the logic a human can only see ~25 fps ths wouldn't be possible. it's enough to show movies with only 24 fps to let you think these aren't only pictures but you can clearly see more than that
|
No... I took a university level chemistry course and this was on my exam. I remember being surprised because I thought humans could see 60FPS, but we can't.
For a video shown at 250FPS, you just have a 1 in 10 chance of seeing a particular frame.
|
That is not true at all. In psychological priming tests, subliminal stimuli can be offered in 1 frame on a 100 frames per second framerate and people can still "see" the stimuli. An easier test would be to just plat a PC game like Half-Life 2 on 30 fps locked and 60 fps locked, you'll notice the difference easily.
