Vetteman94 on 17 October 2011
| radishhead said: I don't feel that ST has acted in a way that deserves a lynch; those who have fought against him so quickly on such little evidence look suspicious to me |
Just curious as to why you dont find him suspicious when he is using essentially no evidence to say another person is guilty. That in it of itself makes him suspicious by your very own rule you list above. So why dont you find him suspicious again? Trying to cover for a scum buddy?
