mjk45 said:
Nothing really the first game had the market albeit a smaller one all to itself and was hugely bundled for ages so R2's 2mill plus sales is all considered pretty good , the disappointment with R3 is Sony was looking at growing the series hence the money spent and the growths not there, People say R2 is responsible for the series going backwards now if R: fom hadn't been so heavily bundled and all those bundled sales where to people who wanted the game regardless then yes ,since thats not the case the best thing is to compare R2 against R3. Also why do people compare games like UC too 10 mill plus sellers as if they are the norm. |
you make so much sense







