MARCUSDJACKSON said:
well its really not that bad. 500k+ is damn good for most games but its still a far cry from what R1 did. i'm not really sure what changed in the franchise to run people away but R2 must have really did something bad for R3 to sell this bad. |
Nothing really the first game had the market albeit a smaller one all to itself and was hugely bundled for ages so R2's 2mill plus sales is all considered pretty good , the disappointment with R3 is Sony was looking at growing the series hence the money spent and the growths not there, People say R2 is responsible for the series going backwards now if R: fom hadn't been so heavily bundled and all those bundled sales where to people who wanted the game regardless then yes ,since thats not the case the best thing is to compare R2 against R3.
Also why do people compare games like UC too 10 mill plus sellers as if they are the norm.
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot







