By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
snakenobi said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
snakenobi said:
Runa216 said:
God is a metaphor, nothing more. I don't believe in anything that doesn't have substantial evidence supporting it. God, as a collective theory, is just too convenient to believe. I go with science. I don't fill in the blanks with fictional omnipotent beings just so I can feel good and trick myself into believing there's more than this life.

I hate religion because not only does it HAVE these irrational beliefs, but history is littered with examples of people pushing these irrational beliefs without good reason.

I maintain that if people could PROVE god was real, prove THEIR god was real, and prove their interpretations of their God are accurate, I'd drop the whole issue.


Buddhism doesn't have a god and most scientist are panthiest

panthiesm is what brings logic(science) and art of life(joy and pain) together

Most scientists consider themselves atheist or agnostic, you don't need to be a panthiest to experience the art of life :) Infact, you can even find that in science if you wanted to.

agnostic really means religion is work in progress

most scientist are pantheist,people use take term very lightly

What the hell are you talking about? Not at all.