Andrespetmonkey said:
snakenobi said:
Runa216 said: God is a metaphor, nothing more. I don't believe in anything that doesn't have substantial evidence supporting it. God, as a collective theory, is just too convenient to believe. I go with science. I don't fill in the blanks with fictional omnipotent beings just so I can feel good and trick myself into believing there's more than this life. I hate religion because not only does it HAVE these irrational beliefs, but history is littered with examples of people pushing these irrational beliefs without good reason. I maintain that if people could PROVE god was real, prove THEIR god was real, and prove their interpretations of their God are accurate, I'd drop the whole issue. |
Buddhism doesn't have a god and most scientist are panthiest
panthiesm is what brings logic(science) and art of life(joy and pain) together
|
Most scientists consider themselves atheist or agnostic, you don't need to be a panthiest to experience the art of life :) Infact, you can even find that in science if you wanted to.
|
agnostic really means religion is work in progress
most scientist are pantheist,people use take term very lightly