Seece on 14 October 2011
| Acevil said: Good scores, but I never truly trusts the earliest scores as a sign of the average reviewer, but if this keeps up, I was totally wrong about the meta. |
Well, yeah I agree, still though the first only got 12 scores above 9, this one is a quater way there and only 3 reviews so far. And it never recieved a 95 at all.
So I think it's a good sign, hopefully it can do 85 overall
