Kasz216 said:
You seem to miss the point. All of the above called them selves Democratic and Republics... and they were neither. Iran is Islamic, it ain't a republic though. To be a Republic you need real voting, you can't have real voting in the confines of one political party, because eveyrthing considered important is already decided by the oligarchy in control. |
But Iran IS a republic. And not because it calls itself a republic (like East Germany had the word 'Democratic' in it's official name, because it sounded nice), but because it has the structure of a republic. The problem is that you seem to simply not understand what a republic is (like many Americans appearently don't, especially those of the REPUBLICan persuasion). What you call 'republic' is actually 'republic + liberal democracy'. Not all republics are liberal democracies (e.g. Iran, the Soviet Union), and not all liberal democracies are republics (e.g. the UK). Try to separate the two, and don't fuse them together.
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)