It's reasonably important to assert that no historical claim has eminence over any other historical claim. All you have are a state and a state-like body, one of which needs territorial integrity to survive (e.g. get the settlers out), and which deserves its right to self-determination as much as the Israelis did. The Israelis took exceptional measures to make sure that their state had territorial integrity, the least the Palestinians deserve is a peaceful process to achieve the same (e.g. get the settlers out). Israel has to move first because of their relative positions, and because presenting the olive branch is the only way to get rid of Hamas short of total extirpation of the Gaza Strip
And cash settlements for current market value on the property that Palestinian refugees were forced off of in lieu of a right of return
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
