By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kamal said:
esssam said:
yo_john117 said:
osamanobama said:
well the land belongs to the israelis, so i would have to say Israel

This.

And how does it belong to them? is it because it used to be theirs according to religion?? ok, but does this give them an excuse to conquer it?? Lets say I used to live in a house and then I moved along and you came to rent it instead, does the fact that I used to live there before you give me an excuse to break in, physically vilate you and take the house? Because I really want to understand, when the jews were not in Israel were they taking a vacation just to come back to their "home" land again when it is finished?

I think Americans can't really talk in this matter when they forcibly eradicated the native Americans from their homeland. So by going that logic it is still their land and they can make settlements to force the British/Americans and leave the true indigenious people there.

I'm 100% with Palestine.

I would totally be Ok with the Native Americans forming an army and driving out Americans from thier homes.

I'd want the US government to fight back because i'd want to keep my shit....

but I'd understand why they were doing it.

Well assuming their main form of driving people out was indiscriminate attacks on indiviudals like the Palestinians....

and if the Native Americans were winning and drove us into a situation like Palestine... what I would want is the US government to give up  no matter how much land it would take and get rid of our extremist terrorists so they would have no excuse to attack us again.  So we could build up our economy and live prosperous lives.

Plus the ability to build up a real army that if people were violent enough to come to it... could take back the rest of the land we thought was ours.

 

And if I died and was reincarnated as a Native American after all that.... I'd understand why the US would be fighting to take back the land too.