esssam said:
Kasz216 said:
esssam said:
yo_john117 said:
osamanobama said:
well the land belongs to the israelis, so i would have to say Israel |
This.
|
And how does it belong to them? is it because it used to be theirs according to religion?? ok, but does this give them an excuse to conquer it?? Lets say I used to live in a house and then I moved along and you came to rent it instead, does the fact that I used to live there before you give me an excuse to break in, physically vilate you and take the house? Because I really want to understand, when the jews were not in Israel were they taking a vacation just to come back to their "home" land again when it is finished?
|
I like how your acting like the Jews picked up and intentionally left. Either your bias is showing or lack of historical knowledge.
Either way it suggests you should take a step back from the thread you've created, and either stop buying into blatant propaganda or just learn more about the situation.
Essentially ask yourself this. If Israel were to force out all the palestinians violently.... would the Palestinians have a right to take back their homeland at a later date.
If your answer here is yes.... then you are basically a hypocrit.
Nevermind the fact that the Jews didn't do it primarily through violence, but instead through money.
|
My answer is indeed yes to your question, you may call me a hypocrit for this but the palestinians UNLIKE the Israelis did not recieve the right to take back their homeland at a later date so ur argument is invalid and contradictory
|
Except it isn't.
I never once claimed Israel had a right to take back their homeland. I actually think what the British did by putting them in Palestine was wrong.
Had i been around back then I would of been Pro-Palestine, like Gahndi was.
HOWEVER, They are back in "their home" now, and you can't blame them for it. They often tried to make peace with Palestine.
They offered more than palestine is offering now back when they had a stronger hand.
