Considering under 2% of all abortions are done for saving the life of the mother........
I am pro-life. Theres no reason to allow mothers kill unborn children for social causes. Don't get knocked up if you don't want a kid. Carry it to full term and put it up for adoption.
It's absolutely amazing that you can goto a hospital, and they will give you warnings for oh-so much in the hospital if your pregnant - and tell you 50 ways to make sure you protect your unborn baby. Yet as soon as that woman decides for an abortion, that same unborn baby becomes an unfeeling, unimportant lump of whatever that can be destroyed like a dirty diaper.
And thats what makes this so hyprocritical. They are unborn kids in 99% of all circumstances, fully able to make it to term without damage to the child, or the mother. It's a social issue, NOT a medical one. Look at the statistics for abortion.
Are these children that deserve to be protected, or useless beings, that are souly to be destroyed under the discretion of the mother? Also, if abortion is purely legal and fine, why do people get extra sentences in jail for killing an unborn child in various crimes?
http://priestsforlife.org/resources/photosbyage/index.htm
http://priestsforlife.org/resources/photosassorted/index.htm
How about fetuses retrieved from dumpsters behind abortion clinics?
http://priestsforlife.org/resources/monica/mm1.htm
Why are procedures like this legal?
http://priestsforlife.org/resources/medical/suctionweb.jpg
http://priestsforlife.org/resources/medical/de.jpg
Just a few faces to look at for pro-choice people. I'm not quite fully understanding why it should be legal to do such things to the 99% of children that are not medical neccessities.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
