By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ishiki said:

I said they needed more than that evidence. Which they didn't have or bungled away. I don't see how anyone can possibly think they should be imprisoned based on that other than for slandering. And she already served her sentence for slander. That's how you create witch hunts.

People thinking they're guilty, is the same thing as those rascist people "thinking" troy davis was guilty. (which I know you thought was dumb).
Thinking she's guilty is fine. But to think that thinking is enough evidence to put her in jail. Is different.
She acts suspicious imo, but that's it. And suspicious is subjective, I've assumed people were acting a certain way, when in fact I was incorrect.

Bundy was weird with the confessions initially and probably never confessing to all of them, nor was that the reason he got put in prison (and escaped!). Evidence was against him. And his reason for killing was that certain values like "thou shall not call" was merely subjective and he said this.  Thus making him a sociopath. They were not able to prove or come up with sufficient evidence that Amanda Knox was a sociopath. 


What?



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)