By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ishiki said:

that doesn't mean guilty. People get coaxed into guilty verdict often.  

Knox's lawyers argued that her purported confession to being in the house during the killing was not true, claiming she had made the admission under no sleep and extreme duress and stress. 

The prosecution didn't do they're job or she is indeed not guilty. if they had any other evidence other than possibly a "police coerced confession" The evidence was faulty. And the motive was "she killed for no reason at all."

whether you liked it or not, or whether you like her or not. this isn't sufficient evidence. And it's italy's court so whot he hell knows what they do there. The only one with evidence is guede.

The problem is is that unlike the other 2. Gued has evidence against him. And His prison time was reduced in half for implicating the other 2 but this was after changing his story as well which resulted in his prison sentence getting cut in half.

Kacey anthony hid her burried child, and had a 200,000$ search, to find a child she knew was dead. This isn't in the same category really, other then both prosecuters possibly sucking.


On another note. Unless you're john lennon. I think the public remembers the killer more than the person who was killed. 

What reason did Ted Bundy have to kill anyone?



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)