Kasz216 said:
Right, and the President could get stuff done quicker if he abolished congress, the Supreme Court and voting. The reason we have a bill of rights is so that peoples rights aren't infringed on... sometimes that means doing things the hard way.
Though you could get rid of a lot of the problem by just making it illegal to give different industries any benefits like subsidies or tax breaks or the like./ |
Yes, but would such a law curtail freedom of expression, if it infringed upon everyone's rights uniformly? The intent of the first amendment is such that the government cannot impugn upon an opinion, no matter how unpopular, but was not designed to fight regulations on one specific mode of speech altogether.
I wonder if i could go out and take a shit on a public sidewalk to make a statement against the city of Philadelphia. Could I then sue after i was arrested? Where does speech end and action begin?
Bear in mind that i understand that judicial precedent has established this as protected speech, but still...

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







