fkusumot said:
Bod, I must not have made myself clear and for that I apologize. Your pointing out the possibility of a "debate in which we define precisely what a soul is" is the debate which I think is pointless unless a plea to religious authority is made. As you said, a gigantic can of worms. My declaration that "Everything relies on semantics when you're just talking aobut it" was simply noting the obvious (I was being a dullard), i.e., semiotics and syntax are crutches we rely on when communicating. |
I love you, by the way.
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">







