Are you Pro-life or Pro-choice?

[Lord N]

Bursche said:
Pro-life. Of course with exceptions in rare cases such as rape, incest, or the mother/baby is in danger. Im sure most pro lifers will agree for these cases.

It is not the RIGHT of a woman to choose between life and death of another. That is like saying if I were the father, I could choose to kill off one of my children becasue they were once part of me. It is so stupid to think of the inhumanity of people doing this because they cant control themselves enough to put on a condom, or just not do it.

Ive known girls who have had three or four, that is inexcusable. If you cant take the responsibility of a child, do not have sex. I have sex, and if my girlfriend got pregnant, we would have it even thoguh I am 17.

The entire concept of pro choice is idiotic at best. How is it a choice to choose to kill a fetus or not? "Oh but Bursche, it doenst feel pain/it isnt human yet?" How doyou know? How do you know it cant feel anything? Do you know how they do abortions? Do you want to be faulted for making anything feel that kind of pain and death? To be tossed out as a mistake. I mean to toss out a human becasue the stupid girl couldnt keep her legs closed, it is so stupid.

If you have any morals, or any kind of shed of humanity, you need to really think about how inhumane it is. Do you support torture? Or killing innocent human beings? Then how can you support something as barbaric as abortion.

It damn well is the right of the mother to abort a fetus if she doesn't want the pregnancy. A fetus is not a sentient being and hence is not the same as killing a child after it has been born. That fetus is still a part of her body.

It isn't as simple a matter of "she couldn't keep her legs closed so she should be forced to have the baby." That's what's idiotic. No form of birth control is 100% effective. Condoms break, birth control pill don't always work, etc. Even if protection wasn't used, to err is human...... People make mistakes, and there needs to be a safe and legal option when this kind of thing happens. Without it, abortion wouldn't go away, it would just go underground and we'd have back-alley abortions like what was going on before Roe vs. Wade. Even in cases when a women is irresponsible and has unprotected sex, who cares? We're talking about a woman removing undeveloped tissue from her body. Are there wars being started because of it? Is the economy suffering? Are people dying?

It makes much more sense to have legal abortion than it does to have the law force all of these women to carry their unwanted pregnancies to term and give them up for adoption. There really isn't a big demand for other peoples' children. Sure, there are people who adopt because they can't have children, but that's the overwhelming minority. When people want kids, they usually just have their own.