By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
spurgeonryan said:
sapphi_snake said:
I don't get the point of this thread, or what the author is claiming.


I am saying the garenda of eden was perhaps a real place, and that this is where it was. Whether you believe the bible or not, it is usually correct historically.

Weeeeell that depends on what you mean by historically. Noahs ark, adam and eve and the creation story altogether really have all been debunked, but I guess you could qualify that as "science" in the bible. Jesus is about as historically accurate as Robin Hood, he's recorded, but we know hardly any facts about him, and most of what we claim to know about him is mostly speculation, we aren't even 100% sure he existed (I think he did though). But some things in the bible are also present in recorded history, plenty of things that aren't though.