| leo-j said: @FJ They stated this on pc. Not on the ps3, they know nothing of the ps3's architecture. |
I'm almost certain that you know nothing of the PS3's structure, other than "CELL ROXORZ" so I don't know why you'd make that comment..
Anyway, seriously, PS3 and 360 fanboys/girls, why would you want crysis on your console anyway? I've played it on a high end comp and yes the graphics are gorgeous, but other than that, it's pretty standard fair FPS wise. Also, I doubt Crytek would want to port over a FPS PC game to a home console, because look at UTIII, PC > PS3 and eventually the 360 in terms of gameplay, it's too fast paced (like most PC FPS are). Reason why CoD4 and Halo are such success on home consoles is because they are slower than PC FPS, particularly Halo, and CoD4 has the "aim-assist" to compensate for the slower pace of the gameplay/analog stick. That's why TF2 gets very little love on xbox live, because it's a game built for PC mouses. Why would a company who lost out on PC want to spend more money tweaking the gameplay and downgrading the graphics for a console version, doesn't make much sense to me.
