By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
oniyide on 28 September 2011
Edit Thread
oni-link said:
oniyide said:
oni-link said:
Pavolink said:
oni-link said:

*rankings and score is my opinion and may vary from other ppl's opinion.

tehehe

Expect people to ignore the warning...


lol...at least I tried to protect myself from fanboy mayhem. We will see if it works or not.  I am pretty fair on my scoring even oniyide can't complain about my rankings IMHO. :P


the hell i cant! i think DC is way too high, and PS2 is too low, but those are your rankings your entitled to your opinions

 

oni-link 3 hours ago

Actually what would be less trollish is if one rates all market leaders and their competitors since the NES days.

Here I'll start:

Gen I=
NES: 9.5
Sega Master System: 7.5

Gen II=
TG-16: 7.8
Genesis: 9.0
SNES: 9.8

Gen III=
Saturn: 7.0
PS1: 9.0
N64: 8.3

Gen IV=
DreamCast: 8.5
Xbox: 8.0
PS2: 8.0
GCN: 8.5

Gen V=
Wii: 8.5
X360: 9.0
PS3: 8.0


*rankings and score is my opinion and may vary from other ppl's opinion.

 

I knew oniyide my buddy was gonna say something. However, I think those scores were pretty fair for their time.  The dreamcast had a few gems and paved way for generation IV and was ahead of it's time in terms of what they were offering.  PS2 even with some stellar games was the weakest console besides the dreamcast during that generation.  It didn't help them when they promised that the PS2 will deliver 10x better graphics than the dreamcast when in fact it actually wasn't.  I have yet to see Shrek and Toy Story type graphics come out for that system; hence 8.0 is a very good number!!!

Sony said that?? Stupid SOny, the only reason why I dont think DC should be that high, is becasue they threw in the towel like bums. Does not really matter if your ahead of your time, when your console is only on the market for a year and a half. All those poor bastards who bought one. Thats just me.