segajon said:
Bladeneo said:
segajon said:
Bladeneo said:
Pro choice; circumstances are sometime unavoidable. If a person doesnt want the child they shouldnt be forced to have it. |
If a person does not want the child the person should not have sex. Don't give me the lame excuse well the condom broke or the birth control didn't work. We all know those are not 100% effective at preventing a pregnancy and never will be. |
What? Since when is sex purely for the purpose of creating a child? Sorry, Im not going to be restricted in my sexual activities because contraception isnt effective enough to ensure i wont get someone pregnant. If someone takes all precautions necessary to prevent the pregnancy, then they shouldnt be forced to endure it. |
Your putting your sexual pleasurments ahead of what could be become a wonderful human being. I think people shouldn't have sex unless they are able to support a child if things do go wrong and a pregnancy happens. Unless you or your partner are unable to produce then be ready for whatever could happen.
|
No is the simple answer to that. I guarantee at the moment if I had a child it would not grow up to be a wonderful human being but im not about to stop having sex because of it. Im 17, my motives may be selfish but ive not even lived a 1/4 of my life potentially, why should I act in such a cautious fashion? To be fair,if people wait till they can support a child to have sex, not alot of people are going to have sex. Most people I know have been born into families with money issues.
