Are you Pro-life or Pro-choice?

[___O_o______]

segajon said:

fazz said:
Pro-choice: I have always thought that, if the kid can't be given a happy, good life, they should let the kid skip to their next chance (yes, I believe in rebirth).

For example, the child would be given... let's say to an orphanage. He would grow up sad, without parents, probably hating life, people and himself. Same if the kid is abused because of the hate his parents have to him, from being an accident or whatever.

Also, I don't believe that the child should be a kind of punishment to dumb teenagers. Childs are human beings, and they should be given love no matter the condition they are born.

Not that the above opinion should be set to stone for everyone, but that's what I think.

Just because a child is not growing up with their parents does meen they can't have a happy or good life. Their are a lot of people that are very nice to adopt a child or be a foster parent for a while. Anyways I think a sad life would be better than no life.

 I agree with both of you to a point, but research has shown (read Freakonomics) the majority of women seeking abortion are of the lower class. Like it or not, not every person in this country is born equal. If you're born in the lower class, it's very hard to get out of it, though there are exceptions.

 Abortion was the reason for the dramatic crime decrease of the 90's, because twenty years prior was Roe vs Wade. The crime decreased not because of a good economy or more police, but because of abortion. Those who were goingn to be born into a lower-class life, weren't born. Pro-life means a world of more crime and less morality in a population in the future, while pro-choice may actually lower crime, meaning more morality in the population in the future IMO.