misterd on 18 January 2008
| ClaudeLv250 said: That's a bad gif/picture. http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/8425/cloverfield4flatze7.jpg |
Almost, but not quite. The basic morphology is right, but the details don't jive with what I remember. It's skin seemed smoother,without those back ridges. The head appeared more separated from the torse, with smaller teeth. And the arms tended to be held out to the side, and the fingers weren't quite as large. At least, that's what I think I saw.
