morenoingrato said:
brendude13 said:
He's right in saying that Monster Hunter will come to the PS Vita inevitably and that 3rd party progress is pretty weak overall (thank god for Capcom). He is also right in saying that a year earlier release isn't always a pro, it was for consoles like the Xbox 360 but definitely not for a console like the Dreamcast, it's too subjective to be in the "Pro" section.
Most of his other 3DS cons were complete crap though, I mainly agreed with his Vita pros such as:
1. Backwards compatibilty with the PSP is pretty huge (should be listed in the 3DS section too).
2. Third party support seems strong for Vita, but Nintendo said the same back when the 3DS was revealed and look at it now, it's too early to judge that one, I'm not touching it.
3. 3G is also a pretty big pro, imagine Call of Duty online on-the-go.
4. As for no clear system selling games, I think the PS Vita does have enough of these, I would say the PS Vita has the same amount of system selling franchises as the 3DS but but nothing on the same level as games like Monster Hunter, Pokemon or Mario.
5. The PS Vita and the 3DS are debuting at the same price, like he said. If the OP was referring to the price of the consoles in the same time frame then I don't think one being more expensive could be considered a con, especially when things like value for money come into play.
6. Also, the Vita not having UMD is obviously a huge pro, the UMD drive is bulky and sucks up power, why bother with it when you can download the same PSP games digitally...minus Crisis Core. >=(
|
I divided your post into different parts.
1. 3DS has full backwars compatibilty, Vita has that for PSPgo releases (and that excludes some pretty big games).
2. 3DS has a strong support for 2012, and about the Vita, it is indeed too early to tell.
3. Agree.
4. Then that is the point, Vita doesn't have huge games like Mario, and there is not a MH for Vita yet, so even if it is coming, you cannot list that as a Pro for Vita, or Pokemon for Nintendo.
5. So what? The current price for 3DS is lower, people won't see that older pirce, but the current one.
6. Then it should ultimately be a PRO with 3DS, but that would sound silly, wouldn't it? And let's not forget about the Point 1.
|
1. The games can easily be added to the store later, and psv has enhanced BC, they both have BC and older games (virtual console) avaliable for download, it should be a pro for both but TC only put it as a pro for 3DS.
2. It's stronger for psv then it is 3ds and he put it as a pro for 3ds...
4. Again saying psv has no system sellers is just wrong and there hasn't been a pokemon game annouced for 3ds yet. I didn't say to list it as a pro I said to take it off as a con.
5. At the very least it needs to be rephrased.
6. It shouldn't be in cons it should be neutral, and again it remains to be seen if there will be an extreme UMD add on released for psv and the games can easily go to the store.
