Why are devs so afraid of make unfair battles?

[yo_john117]

Xxain said:

yo_john117 said:

Xxain said:

yo_john117 said:
What games have you been playing? Most games have you vastly outnumbered by the enemies.

His xxample looks like a RPG reference. .. what he means are enemies that aggressions. You may have tons of enemies in GoW or Dynasty Warriors but when AI is stupid as hell does it matter? its still balanced .. they have quantity and you have Quality, now what if they Quality and Quality? Why are developer scared to do that?

Well as far as RPG games are concerned I guess he's right. I have yet to see a RPG game that has Quality and Quantity. Although I imagine the combination would be incredibly hard.

That happens in every game. Every game(xxcept demons Souls which goes in favor of enemies) has a balance system that in account everything you can and what possible equipment/skills/whatever you have,xxample: the game knows that the long sord weapon you just got is best weapon you can have, and lv10 "should be the average (not the highest ) level you reach so adjust this area to compensate for that.. When you play your little shooters, with enemies serving as nothing but targets which you heat shot like nothin... why cant they near human like abilities? When you play GoW3 why are the enemies that outnumber you nowhere nears as agressive as you? you pounding them into ground and there just circling around you takin little jabs.

Eh i'd have to disagree with you on the every game part. Go play Halo Reach with all the skulls on Legendary with 4 person co-op...guarantee you would get ripped in half. COD games on the highest difficulty are sometimes so hard the game just feels cheap.

Sure there are a lot of games that do that but there are more that are just crazy tough than you think.