| vlad321 said: Sorry but I had to shorten your response a little for the sake of space. The article did not mention anything about abuse as a response, so you are arguing with somethign that was not claimed. However even then, taking the example of a bully, if you proceed to smash the bully's face in the pavement, kick him a few times in the ribs while he is down, then once in the face for good measure, I can guarantee with aroun 98% certainty he will not be bullying you again. If it happens to fall in the 2% who continue to do so, repeat grinding his bones into dust again, and next time I guarantee 100% that he won't be bullying again. It just WORKS, that's reality. |
It's understandable
Yeah I know about not using the abuse in the article, but one or more people had that mind set and like you yourself seem to have it aswell thats why I spoke against that.
I was bullied[name calling] once and I didn't fight back, instead I went to the principle. Principle set the 2 bullies straight and they never bothered me again.I didn't lift a finger and I garantee you, the bullies didn't bother me 100% of the time later. That's better then me beating them up. Now if you have to defend yourself physically, if it's even allowed (I'm not sure yet)... but if you have to then atleast take concious in giving the other person the least amount of damage because whats the difference between you and him if you don't take concious in the other person? The bully didn't take concious in you when he was bulling you, and if you act the same then you wouldnt act any better, with anger and vengence, malice.
All gaming systems, consoles/PC, have thier perks... why fight over preferences? I like Coke and you like Pepsi, that's it, let's not fight over which toy we like best cause that's what they are. Is someone's preference in a toy important or is the relationship between you and your neighbor more important? Answer is obvious, but THE most important thing is your relationship with God almighty. God Bless you in Jesus's name.
I can communicate without talking... I can send a loved one money without actually sending money... and I can commit theft without the product disappearing, the point of theft is the point of theft not one of it's possible symptoms which is the product dissappearing. The thief wants to gain something without paying for it, that's the point of theft, the thief doesn't have to care or anybody else has to care if the product dissappears. The product dissappearing is just a possible symptom of theft. Gifts are sacrfices, in order to give a gift, it has to be a genuine sacrfice/gift, meaning a copy of the game isn't still in your PC. Piracy is theft and/or being a culprit of theft.
