By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I haven't looked and I don't plan to look but I'm willing to bet that the site that gave it a 67/100 did it for the attention that bad reviews of good products always get. I remember going to Rotten Tomatoes for reviews of Toy Story 3. Out of all of the positive reviews, I found myself clicking all of the negative reviews (even though there were only 3 or 4). If it's someone's opinion, more power to them. It's just that it's is so far from the opinion of everybody else. They won't get a "hit" from me.

Looks like Gears is going to rest at 91. It takes quite a few perfect scores to raise a 67 back up above 91%. I don't see it happening. Won't hurt my enjoyment of the game in a couple of hours, though. It just sucks.

 

*Edit*  Okay.  I admit it.  I was weak and I clicked on the link.  I skimmed the review to avoid spoilers but I didn't agree with much of what I saw.  They actually said that Gears 3's graphics was one of the worst examples of what the Unreal Engine could do.  WTF!?  Their final score wasn't a 67%, though.  It was a B-.  I guess a "B-" translates to a 67% on Metacritic.  Oh well.  Whatareyagonnado? *shrugs*