sapphi_snake said:
1. It excludes homosexuals, because it's a law that only takes into consideration and benefit heterosexuals. Homosexuals are attracted sexually/emotionally to people of the same sex, so it's pretty obvious that they'd want to marry someone of the same sex. But they can't do theat, because marriage laws exclude them, as they are made (by heterosexuals) to meet the necessities of heterosexuals (thus excluding homosexuals and being discriminatory). 2. No, you're completely wrong about DADT. It did not allow gays to serve, hence why gays were discharged if it was found out they were gay. The law essentially said that gays couold serve if they pretended to not be gay, but if the fact that they were gay was found out by someone, then they'd be discharged (because gays couldn't serve in the military). And there were no punishments for the people who did the 'ask' part either. This was no different then how things were before it (as a gay person could always serve if he/she pretended to be straight and no one found out the truth). DADT didn't change anything (it probably made things worse), hence why I called it a sham law, and essentially an euphanism for institutionalized discrimination. I hope I don't have to repeat myself again regarding this point. |
1) i cant marry a man either. the law applies to me as well, so try harder.
also way to ignore, the persucuted people that cant marry cousins or sisters, or 2 wives.
2) now your just showing that you know nothing about DADT. or the history of it, (which at at the time of its passage was praised by gay community, because it allowed them to serve).
so i ask again, what "right" do I have that gays dont. please just tell me.
