sapphi_snake said:
Or more likely he was just a heartless jer who liked mentally torturing people. People with Asperger syndrome can be 'evil', you know. |
Perfectly possible in theory, but doctors should visit him and determine it, from the little we know about him, he's not one of those with Asperger that manage to have a normal life, he looks like one of those seriously handicapped in social life and that didn't receive adequate assistance to overcome their problems instead. And if I can't really say whether he's evil or not, I'm 100% sure that the "normal" schoolmates that bullied that poor girl until she committed suicide are actually evil and were totally conscious and willing when they did it, so it makes me furious that judges want to punish that turd that never trolled any of the dead girls when they were alive, he didn't even know them, but let the evil girls that bullied the last victim get away with it. Punishment must be proportional to guilt, those guilty of a more serious offence and with less mitigating factors must receive a heavier penalty, those guilty of a less serious one and with more mitigating factors must receive a lighter one: in this case, bully schoolgirls received NO penalty, so, applying the principle of proportionality, what should be the penalty for the poor turd?







