sapphi_snake said:
Make no mistake, I actually read his whole post (despite the fact that I felt the need to stop reading after his first paragraph, because it clearly indicated what was coming), and I just didn't agree with him. Harassment shouldn't be protected by free speech laws. And many people are actually misdiagnosed with Asperger syndrome, so the guy could've been just a jerk. From what I know about Asperger syndrome, they're capable of controlling their actions, and this guy clearly displayed a pattern of harassing people deliberately, hence he is a danger to society. |
It seems like a stretch to call that harrasment without any threat of physical harm. Though then again, UK harrasment laws have been used to prosecute peaceful protesters... so I guess it's more an issue with the UK's batshit crazy laws in general...
I mean hell, how many people bash other people in public? If repeated insulting of a girl who killed herself (who he had never met before hand) is harrasment, what's to say that repeatidly insulting the Prime Minister on national TV isn't harrassment?








