bmmb1 said:
Not critical, but since I don't recall it, can you please provide a source for this - "earlier this year Capcom stated it would be scaling back its 3DS support" ? Only thing I vaguely recall is that at some point BEFORE 3Ds even came out Capcom said they will have less Nintendo titles for the fiscal year (not 3DS specifically but Nintendo) but with more focus on quality. You say that you think if TriG doesn't sell enough as far as Capcom wants then MH4 will probably be cancelled, and you use PS3 as an example. But Capcom's stated reason for moving Tri from PS3 was HD development costs, not PS3 sales. This (beyond possible incentives from Nintendo) may be the reasoning behind MH4 on the 3DS as well, since it is the only new console that still does not necessitate HD level development... So, while I don't rule out multi platform, I don't see MH4 leaving the 3DS regardless of TriG sales. As Said earlier, TriG is probably simply a way to get additional MH fans on the 3DS (beyond of course being a way to get yet more money while using the same assets...) |
Sure, I was reading the news from multiple sources earlier today. The announcement was that Capcom would be scaling back Wii/3DS development and focusing on 360/PS3. This was announced during their plans for this fiscal year so it is likely the story your thinking of. However Capcom specifically mentions 3DS as seeing support downsized! (Sources= Planet3DS, FrontTowardGamer, MyNintendoNews) But your wrong all the articles specifically mention 3DS and Capcom downgrading support of that platform.
I can't disagree that Tri was moved from PS3 do to dev costs. However keep in mind prior to Tri Monster Hunter was still not as big on home consoles. The second Monster Hunter which launched on PS2 only sold 630,000 copies which while successful is not going to make enough profit to offset the high cost of developing on PS3 nearby launch. However this time round look at PSP's sales of Monster Hunter titles, the PSP titles sold up to 5-million units which is far greater then Tri did on Wii. Infact if Capcom thinks they could sell 5-million units on Vita or another platform rather then launching on 3DS then HD costs aren't going to matter.
Look at the sales of the PSP Monster Hunter titles, the argued fact that Nintendo improved North American sales is proven false with a quick look at the VGChartz sales figures. If MH3G fails to perform on 3DS and doesn't meet good sales then MH4 will definatly be in jeoprody.A pay off by Nintendo would definatly help keep MH4 on 3DS but even Nintendo couldn't give Capcom enough money to make up for around 4 million more sales if MH4 was to be launched on another platform.
I also agree that MH3G is probably a ploy to get MH fans to buy 3DS, but that doesn't mean if it fails to sell many copies that Capcom will not see it as a red flag. I think if MH3G fails to sell then I doubt MH4 will come to 3DS exclusively if at all!
Infact Nintendo has way more to gain from MH3G and MH4 being exclusive then Capcom does. So much more to gain that I don't see how it will benefit Capcom. Nintendo couldn't possibly give them enough money to make launching exclusively on 3DS worth Capcom's while unless MH3G actually sells well.
I mean if MH4 comes exclusively to 3DS then Nintendo could expect up to 5-million in sales if it performed like the PSP versions did. If thats the case then it could be the biggest thing coming to 3DS to date (From a third party). It could shift millions of 3DS hardware, but again how would Capcom benefit?
Rol likes to just write me off but I'm not being irrational!
-JC7
"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer