Should there be a child limit on those that rely on government assistance?

[thranx]

oldschoolfool said:

thranx said:

oldschoolfool said:
i'd say no. who is the govment to tell people,how many kids to have?

well in that case. why is the government going to take care of kids that people have that they cant care of? People seem to want it both ways i am free to decide how many kids i have, but i expect the government (my nieghbors) to pick up my slack. The ones really hurt are the kids who are brought up by parents that are unable to do so, either financially, mentally, or dont have the time to do so.

well,america is'nt china. I mean,what's next is america going to ban sugar,fatty foods,soda,guns,and anything that's a burden on the health system and goverment. I mean,I don't have the answer's,but I just don't think the govment telling people how to live there lives is the answer. 

I agree completely. I was just looking at it in a different way. I am all for more freedoms and less government running our lives. That would include cutting back on social programs as well. If people are always relying on the government they will not learn to rely on them selves.