Can any of you experts who believe in pancake theory for the falling floors explain to me why there were NO FLOORS found at ground zero?? Shouldn't pancake theory imply that the floors, you know, PANCAKED? Thus, shouldn't their be a pile of floors at ground zero? Why was their nothing but powder and tiny shards of steel? And what happened to the massive core of the WTC? Pancake theory would mean that the floors broke from the steel core in the center, and the cores would have still been in tact. Even PBS in their documentary, when they do a digital animation of the pancake collapse, they still show the steel cores in tact as the floors fall. Also, a pancaking collapse would have taken far longer than 10 seconds, because each floor needs time to fall onto the floor below, and knock out all the thousands of steel bolts... For the buildings to have fallen in 10 seconds means virtually NO resistance. Yeah, steel beams that are welded and bolted to the sides, not to mention concrete, glass, and other pieces of solid matter offer no resistance.. hahaha
Where is this huge mash of steel that is supposedly crushing its way through all the mass and all the steel below it, and causing this 10 second collapse? All I see is a large smoke cloud that falls. When you watch the footage, you clearly see that the tower is not "falling." It is tearing itself apart from top to bottom. There are also several explosive squibs projecting out at the speed of 100s of miles an hour ahead of the demolition wave, but that's a whole 'nother story..
Wouldn't logic tell you that if the amount of mass below the impact zone > the amount of mass above it, that would be sufficient to resist any force from the top portion? Here, try this experiment. Drop a paperweight onto your desk. Does your desk collapse? That's what I thought.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
