By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 on 12 September 2011
Edit Thread
tolu619 said:
wfz said:
The Touch screen already acts as a second analog stick.. In fact, it is a better alternative because it's more like a mouse.

I would never want a second analog stick on the 3DS.


This. Well, almost. I don't mind a second analog stick as it provides more flexibilty and flexibility is always a good thing. However, I think the touch screen does more than a second stick would, but if the option was there from the start for those who would prefer it, no problem. A redesign so soon after lwith a second analog is not needed imo. As for the Vita, since its only touch screen is the gameplay screen and using it heavily would mean you'd be blocking your own view, a second analog stick is more needed than on the 3DS.

And after buying a PSP, getting disappointed then eventually getting a DS, I agree that some experiences shouldn't be on a portable. I have no problem with dual analog sticks though.

actually, no, that's wrong.

Did you not know that there is a track pad on the back of the vita? It has a touchscreen, and a track pad on the back, so those fingers back there can manipulate the camera. Vita doesn't even need the dual analogs, but it doesn't hurt.

I'd hate to start questioning whether half of you defenders are simply casuals, but I can't help it since some of you don't even know the control styles of the consoles.

However, I would also point out to the detractors that not having an analog isn't the end of the world. It would be nice, but it's not such a big deal. It's just better to have options, especially when the typical profit margin on a Nintendo console is beyond adequate.  It's more of a big deal to gamers, who are just being nickle and dimed by VG companies recently, what with excessive DLC, and missing features, and redesigns.