By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chrizum on 10 September 2011
Edit Thread
osamanobama said:
Chrizum said:
osamanobama said:
Chrizum said:

Also, if you're deadset on taking CNet's side: check out this comparison chart: PS3 doesn't do too well on it.


your own link shows the ps3 won.

CNET's 2011 Blu-ray players chart Samsung BD-D6700 LG BD670 Panasonic DMP-BDT210 Sony BDP-S580 Toshiba BDX5200 Philips BDP5506 Oppo BDP-93 PS3 Slim          
                             
                           

 

 CNET ratings                        

 

 Design 6 8 8 7 6 6   8   Peach color indicates  

 

 Features 9 9 9 8 6 6   9   reference players  

 

 Performance 7 7 8 8 6 4   9        

 

 Overall 7.6 8.0 8.4 7.8 6.0 5.2   8.7        

 

                          

 

 Price (as of 5/5) $210 $160 $155 $155 $140 $165 $500 $300        

 

                  


You missed the point of the comparison. PS3 won on design and features, but when you look closer at the Blu-ray specific tests, PS3 is not doing too well in comparison to the other Blu-ray players.

no, it also won performance. 

and it faired very well in most things. features, visuals, audio, etc.

face it, your wrong.  your own link show you that you wrong. cnets word> your word

LOL, again, I understand your brand loyalty, and I'm not saying the PS3 is a bad Blu-ray player (it's not bad at all) but it's NOT a high-end blu-ray player anno 2011 anymore. Do some research...