By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jake_the_fake1 said:
...


OK, so you have allot of examples, but with out a theory from you to explain your opposing view, all you really have is allot of examples.

I'll make it simple, if science is wrong, and evolution is just a bucnh of crap, then what field/theory is right? what perfectly explains the dieversity and orings of life as we know it?

Please don't disapoint me, just provide me with the answer to my questions, which of course is your theory, and let me descide weather what you says has sound logical sense or not...so go for it champ!

1. the OPs examples are hardly hard evidence.  fossil records don't provide DNA (despite what Jurassic Park says).  therefore all we can compare is the most general physilogical elements of these animals: bone structure for instance.  without DNA evidence we can't really prove or disprove genetic disparity.  the true distinction of one species to another is the ability to reproduce. fossils can't provide that information.

2. the OP does not understand the fundemental concept of evolution.  for evolution to occur you need some sort of a stimulus.  there is not change without a need.  evolution is about having the best ability to surive in your environment.  if the environment doesn't change then neither will your species and change in a way that requires the species to adapt or die evolution need not apply.  therefore finding excepttions isn't exactly ground breaking or even unexpected. 

therefore to answer your question: science is not known to be wrong given the current set of data.  if actual evidence come to disprove the current scientific theories science will change to incorporate that expanded data set.